Jump to content

User talk:Trade

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 1 day ago by Josve05a in topic Notification about possible deletion
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Trade!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Not PD-DOGE

[edit]

Please stop adding {{PD-DOGE}} to File:Logo of the Department of Government Efficiency.svg. This is a .svg file of File:Department of Government Efficiency Logo.png, which was created in 2024, prior to DOGE being a part of the U.S. government. WeatherWriter (talk) 14:36, 7 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Bikini Femboy (52661231364).jpg

[edit]
File:Bikini Femboy (52661231364).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:09, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Easter Bunny Girl (53620819946).jpg

[edit]
File:Easter Bunny Girl (53620819946).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:10, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Nekopara Vanilla Cosplay Bondage (50976382291).jpg

[edit]
File:Nekopara Vanilla Cosplay Bondage (50976382291).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

About the photograph of "SCP-953"

[edit]

Hello. Regarding this photograph which you reposted from Flickr, I believe the subject of the photo may be cosplaying as Dr. Toraya rather than SCP-953. I have raised the discussion on the talk page, so I would appreciate it if you could take a look. ノボホショコロトソ (talk) 16:17, 12 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:41, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reopening closed DR

[edit]

Hello, I have just noticed you reopened Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Tyler James Robinson on October 7 when it was already closed by Infrogmation on October 4 [1].

I don’t think it was correct procedure to just simply revert their close. Also, since reopening the DR, you didn’t notify me again. I only noticed the DR was reopened, when I noticed on my watchlist that you added the DR tags to the files today.

I do agree with you that more participation to the discussion is welcomed, but I just disagree with the out-of-process method you chose to do it. Also, the DR is currently causing issues according to User:Krdbot/lost deletion requests.

Therefore, I think it would have been way simpler if you would have just opened another DR, instead of reverting the close. So, could you re-close the DR (since it was re-opened out of process) and open another one properly? Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 02:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

"Therefore, I think it would have been way simpler if you would have just opened another DR, instead of reverting the close." Infrogmation could simply decide to close the new DR like he did this one so ultimately that would accomplish very little
I apologize for not pinging you after reverting him. That's on me being forgetful Trade (talk) 02:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your reply. In my opinion, no matter what you think Infrogmation did (or may possibly do) was correct or not, I think it is still out-of-process to revert a closed DR like that. The reason for that is reverting may cause issues (such as the lack of notification I got, or the issues currently in User:Krdbot/lost deletion requests) that can be avoided if you had simply nominated them normally again.
Alternatively, you could have consulted the closing admin (pinging @Infrogmation) and they can decide to revert the DR close themselves.
In the end of the day, I have been notified again one way or another, and I just wanted to figure what causing the issues in User:Krdbot/lost deletion requests, that’s why I suggest maybe re-closing the DR can fix it. If it can be solved another way, then I’m fine leaving the DR as it is. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 03:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Talkback notice

[edit]
Hello, Trade. You have new messages at Dan Leonard's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Dan Leonard (talk) 23:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Vice President JD Vance Delivers Remarks at a Turning Point USA Tour Event.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PublicDomainFan08 (talk) 18:44, 1 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Would You Like to Dance?.webm

[edit]
File:Would You Like to Dance?.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Johnj1995 (talk) 21:10, 1 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Copyright status: File:Design Power Hour no. 12; Sugar Skwid.webm

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ತುಳು  Türkçe  українська  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Design Power Hour no. 12; Sugar Skwid.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:34, 4 November 2025 (UTC)Reply